Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL - WASHINGTON 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL - WASHINGTON
CCN 260052 | MO | 140 beds | Current EBITDA $33.2M → Pro Forma $43.9M (+$10.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$202.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$43.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$10.7M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $10.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$130K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.1M$4.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.9M$112K$4.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$622K$1.8M$2.5M$7.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$130K$130K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$823K$1.6M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$65K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.2M$33.2M16.4%
Year 1$34.2M+$7.1M$41.4M20.4%
Year 2$35.3M+$10.7M$45.9M22.6%
Year 3$36.3M+$10.7M$47.0M23.2%
Year 4$37.4M+$10.7M$48.1M23.7%
Year 5$38.5M+$10.7M$49.2M24.3%
$332.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$541.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$208.9M
Value Created
$49.2M
Exit EBITDA
$53.0M
Organic Growth
$106.7M
RCM Value Creation
$49.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.1M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$65K$97K$130K$156K
Total$5.3M$8.0M$10.7M$12.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.4%-13.5%-2.7%8.6%
P88
Net-to-Gross22.8%22.4%26.3%36.3%
P27
Occupancy45.9%46.5%64.0%74.6%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.4M$578K$1.2M$1.4M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.2M$638K$1.2M$1.6M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML