Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HEALTH TRUMAN MED CENTER 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HEALTH TRUMAN MED CENTER
CCN 260048 | MO | 258 beds | Current EBITDA $-73.1M → Pro Forma $-44.7M (+$28.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$540.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-73.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-44.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$28.5M
Modeled Uplift
$20.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.5M (vs $28.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$346K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.8M$10.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.4M$297K$10.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$4.9M$6.6M$20.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$346K$346K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$173K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K
Cumulative$0$7.7M$15.5M$23.1M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-73.1M$-73.1M-13.5%
Year 1$-75.3M+$19.0M$-56.4M-10.4%
Year 2$-77.6M+$28.5M$-49.2M-9.1%
Year 3$-79.9M+$28.5M$-51.5M-9.5%
Year 4$-82.3M+$28.5M$-53.9M-10.0%
Year 5$-84.8M+$28.5M$-56.3M-10.4%
$-731.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-619.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$111.7M
Value Created
$-56.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-116.5M
Organic Growth
$284.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-56.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$173K$260K$346K$415K
Total$14.2M$21.3M$28.5M$34.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.5%-12.5%-3.1%4.1%
P20
Net-to-Gross56.1%22.7%26.3%29.4%
P89
Occupancy78.1%48.2%65.9%72.9%
P83
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.1M$1.4M$1.6M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML