Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AMEND #2 RESEARCH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AMEND #2 RESEARCH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 260027 | MO | 337 beds | Current EBITDA $-25.2M → Pro Forma $463K (+$25.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$487.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-25.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$463K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$25.6M
Modeled Uplift
$17.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.8M (vs $25.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$312K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.7M$9.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.4M$268K$9.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$312K$312K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.3M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$156K$312K$312K$312K$312K$312K$312K
Cumulative$0$7.0M$14.0M$20.8M$25.6M$25.6M$25.6M$25.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-459.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
466.0x
Headroom (turns)
7169%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7169% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -459.5x, adding 558.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-25.2M$-25.2M-5.2%
Year 1$-25.9M+$17.1M$-8.8M-1.8%
Year 2$-26.7M+$25.6M$-1.1M-0.2%
Year 3$-27.5M+$25.6M$-1.9M-0.4%
Year 4$-28.3M+$25.6M$-2.7M-0.6%
Year 5$-29.2M+$25.6M$-3.5M-0.7%
$-251.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-39.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$212.6M
Value Created
$-3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-40.1M
Organic Growth
$256.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.9M$7.3M$9.7M$11.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$156K$234K$312K$374K
Total$12.8M$19.2M$25.6M$30.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.2%-11.9%-1.6%5.5%
P41
Net-to-Gross12.0%22.9%26.7%29.4%
P6
Occupancy68.4%54.9%66.8%75.1%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML