Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PHELPS COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CNTR 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PHELPS COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CNTR
CCN 260017 | MO | 196 beds | Current EBITDA $89.4M → Pro Forma $103.6M (+$14.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$270.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$103.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$14.2M
Modeled Uplift
$9.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.2M (vs $14.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$173K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$149K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$830K$2.5M$3.3M$10.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$173K$173K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$87K$173K$173K$173K$173K$173K$173K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.5M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89.4M$89.4M33.1%
Year 1$92.1M+$9.5M$101.6M37.6%
Year 2$94.8M+$14.2M$109.1M40.3%
Year 3$97.7M+$14.2M$111.9M41.4%
Year 4$100.6M+$14.2M$114.8M42.5%
Year 5$103.6M+$14.2M$117.9M43.6%
$893.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.30B
Exit EV (11x)
$402.5M
Value Created
$117.9M
Exit EBITDA
$142.4M
Organic Growth
$142.2M
RCM Value Creation
$117.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$87K$130K$173K$208K
Total$7.1M$10.7M$14.2M$17.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.1%-15.8%-3.1%3.6%
P95
Net-to-Gross22.4%23.0%26.2%31.7%
P20
Occupancy38.8%46.2%56.8%72.9%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.4M$914K$1.3M$1.5M
P52
Exp/Bed$923K$771K$1.4M$1.6M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML