Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KPC PROMISE HOSPITAL OF VICKSBURG 2026-04-26 09:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KPC PROMISE HOSPITAL OF VICKSBURG
CCN 252008 | MS | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $-990K (+$322K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$322K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-990K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+544bps
Margin Improvement
$227K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$322K
Modeled Uplift
$214K
Risk-Adjusted
-$108K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$122K
+206bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$118K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$72K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$322K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$114K$8K$122K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$54K$72K$227K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$31K$61K$92K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Cost to Collect$0$30K$59K$89K$118K$118K$118K$118K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$48K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$89K$178K$262K$322K$322K$322K$322K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $322K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-22.2%
Year 1$-1.4M+$215K$-1.1M-19.2%
Year 2$-1.4M+$322K$-1.1M-18.1%
Year 3$-1.4M+$322K$-1.1M-18.8%
Year 4$-1.5M+$322K$-1.2M-19.5%
Year 5$-1.5M+$322K$-1.2M-20.3%
$-13.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-13.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-70K
Value Created
$-1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.1M
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$61K$92K$122K$146K
Cost to Collect$59K$89K$118K$142K
A/R Days Reduction$36K$54K$72K$86K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$161K$241K$322K$386K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.2%-25.5%-14.4%-3.5%
P32
Net-to-Gross34.2%28.2%42.2%56.6%
P38
Occupancy44.8%22.4%35.6%52.8%
P65
Rev/Bed$169K$447K$648K$899K
P8
Exp/Bed$206K$466K$738K$1.0M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML