Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF MERIDIAN 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF MERIDIAN
CCN 252006 | MS | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $776K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$585K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$776K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$585K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$423K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$585K
Modeled Uplift
$382K
Risk-Adjusted
-$203K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$221K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$221K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$134K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$585K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$221K$221K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$212K$8K$221K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$100K$134K$423K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$55K$110K$165K$221K$221K$221K$221K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$55K$110K$165K$221K$221K$221K$221K
A/R Days Reduction$0$45K$89K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$160K$320K$475K$585K$585K$585K$585K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $585K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$776K$776K7.0%
Year 1$799K+$390K$1.2M10.8%
Year 2$823K+$585K$1.4M12.8%
Year 3$848K+$585K$1.4M13.0%
Year 4$873K+$585K$1.5M13.2%
Year 5$899K+$585K$1.5M13.5%
$7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.6M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$5.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$110K$165K$221K$265K
Denial Rate Reductio$110K$165K$221K$265K
A/R Days Reduction$67K$101K$134K$161K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$293K$439K$585K$702K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.0%-25.4%-14.0%-2.1%
P91
Net-to-Gross12.1%27.7%41.8%54.7%
P5
Occupancy39.0%21.8%35.6%50.9%
P56
Rev/Bed$276K$484K$645K$870K
P11
Exp/Bed$256K$465K$728K$1.0M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML