Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOHN C. STENNIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOHN C. STENNIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 251335 | MS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.3M → Pro Forma $-1.3M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$737K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$655K
Risk-Adjusted
-$356K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$384K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$380K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$234K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$384K$384K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$370K$11K$380K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$59K$175K$234K$737K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$96K$192K$288K$384K$384K$384K$384K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$95K$190K$285K$380K$380K$380K$380K
A/R Days Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$234K$234K$234K$234K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$275K$550K$819K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.3M$-2.3M-12.2%
Year 1$-2.4M+$674K$-1.7M-9.1%
Year 2$-2.5M+$1.0M$-1.5M-7.7%
Year 3$-2.6M+$1.0M$-1.6M-8.1%
Year 4$-2.6M+$1.0M$-1.6M-8.5%
Year 5$-2.7M+$1.0M$-1.7M-8.9%
$-23.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-18.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.7M
Value Created
$-1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.7M
Organic Growth
$10.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$192K$288K$384K$461K
Denial Rate Reductio$190K$285K$380K$456K
A/R Days Reduction$117K$175K$234K$280K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$505K$758K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.2%-25.6%-14.9%-5.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross50.3%30.7%46.5%58.0%
P56
Occupancy32.8%21.9%35.6%50.6%
P43
Rev/Bed$768K$384K$658K$922K
P62
Exp/Bed$862K$464K$752K$1.1M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML