Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANKLIN COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANKLIN COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 251330 | MS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $213K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$995K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$213K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$995K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$726K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$995K
Modeled Uplift
$683K
Risk-Adjusted
-$313K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Payer Diversity. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$378K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$375K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$230K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$995K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$378K$378K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$364K$10K$375K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$172K$230K$726K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$95K$189K$284K$378K$378K$378K$378K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$94K$187K$281K$375K$375K$375K$375K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$153K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$271K$542K$807K$995K$995K$995K$995K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $995K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x108% / 39.4x113% / 44.1x118% / 48.9x120% / 51.2x122% / 53.6x
9.0x103% / 34.7x108% / 38.9x112% / 43.1x114% / 45.2x116% / 47.3x
10.0x99% / 30.9x103% / 34.7x107% / 38.5x110% / 40.4x111% / 42.2x
11.0x94% / 27.8x99% / 31.2x103% / 34.7x105% / 36.4x107% / 38.1x
12.0x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.4x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.1x103% / 34.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.0x
Headroom (turns)
77%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 77% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.5x, adding 7.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$213K$213K1.1%
Year 1$219K+$663K$883K4.7%
Year 2$226K+$995K$1.2M6.5%
Year 3$233K+$995K$1.2M6.5%
Year 4$240K+$995K$1.2M6.5%
Year 5$247K+$995K$1.2M6.6%
$2.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.5M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$339K
Organic Growth
$10.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$189K$284K$378K$454K
Denial Rate Reductio$187K$281K$375K$449K
A/R Days Reduction$115K$173K$230K$276K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$498K$746K$995K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.1%-25.6%-14.9%-5.9%
P85
Net-to-Gross73.0%30.7%46.5%58.0%
P91
Occupancy46.7%21.9%35.6%50.6%
P72
Rev/Bed$757K$384K$658K$922K
P57
Exp/Bed$748K$464K$752K$1.1M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML