Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON DAVIS GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON DAVIS GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 251326 | MS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $89K → Pro Forma $823K (+$734K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$734K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$823K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$535K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$734K
Modeled Uplift
$438K
Risk-Adjusted
-$297K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$279K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$277K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$170K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$734K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$279K$279K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$268K$8K$277K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$127K$170K$535K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$70K$139K$209K$279K$279K$279K$279K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$69K$138K$207K$277K$277K$277K$277K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$113K$170K$170K$170K$170K$170K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$200K$400K$596K$734K$734K$734K$734K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $734K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x131% / 65.6x136% / 73.3x141% / 80.9x143% / 84.7x145% / 88.6x
9.0x125% / 58.0x130% / 64.8x135% / 71.6x137% / 75.0x139% / 78.4x
10.0x120% / 51.8x125% / 58.0x130% / 64.1x132% / 67.2x134% / 70.2x
11.0x116% / 46.8x121% / 52.4x125% / 58.0x127% / 60.8x129% / 63.5x
12.0x112% / 42.7x117% / 47.8x121% / 52.9x123% / 55.4x125% / 58.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.6x
Headroom (turns)
86%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 86% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.9x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89K$89K0.6%
Year 1$92K+$490K$581K4.2%
Year 2$94K+$734K$829K5.9%
Year 3$97K+$734K$832K6.0%
Year 4$100K+$734K$835K6.0%
Year 5$103K+$734K$838K6.0%
$889K
Entry EV (10x)
$9.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.3M
Value Created
$838K
Exit EBITDA
$142K
Organic Growth
$7.3M
RCM Value Creation
$838K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$139K$209K$279K$334K
Denial Rate Reductio$138K$207K$277K$332K
A/R Days Reduction$85K$127K$170K$204K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$367K$551K$734K$881K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.6%-25.6%-14.9%-5.9%
P82
Net-to-Gross76.6%30.7%46.5%58.0%
P96
Occupancy12.0%21.9%35.6%50.6%
P10
Rev/Bed$557K$384K$658K$922K
P38
Exp/Bed$554K$464K$752K$1.1M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML