Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFF ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTE 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFF ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTE
CCN 250104 | MS | 270 beds | Current EBITDA $-55.2M → Pro Forma $-43.9M (+$11.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$213.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-55.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-43.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$11.2M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $11.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$136K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$117K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$654K$1.9M$2.6M$8.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$136K$136K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$865K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$68K$136K$136K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.1M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-55.2M$-55.2M-25.9%
Year 1$-56.8M+$7.5M$-49.3M-23.1%
Year 2$-58.5M+$11.2M$-47.3M-22.2%
Year 3$-60.3M+$11.2M$-49.1M-23.0%
Year 4$-62.1M+$11.2M$-50.9M-23.8%
Year 5$-63.9M+$11.2M$-52.7M-24.7%
$-551.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-579.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-28.4M
Value Created
$-52.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-87.8M
Organic Growth
$112.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-52.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$68K$102K$136K$164K
Total$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.9%-16.5%-9.0%-0.8%
P15
Net-to-Gross28.0%14.4%21.3%25.8%
P75
Occupancy38.5%31.6%49.7%65.1%
P40
Rev/Bed$790K$609K$788K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$994K$669K$1.0M$1.2M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML