Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREENWOOD LEFLORE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREENWOOD LEFLORE HOSPITAL
CCN 250099 | MS | 173 beds | Current EBITDA $-30.9M → Pro Forma $-26.7M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$79.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-30.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-26.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$972K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$245K$727K$972K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$399K$799K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$395K$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$324K$648K$972K$972K$972K$972K$972K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-30.9M$-30.9M-38.7%
Year 1$-31.9M+$2.8M$-29.1M-36.4%
Year 2$-32.8M+$4.2M$-28.6M-35.8%
Year 3$-33.8M+$4.2M$-29.6M-37.1%
Year 4$-34.8M+$4.2M$-30.6M-38.3%
Year 5$-35.9M+$4.2M$-31.7M-39.7%
$-309.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-348.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-38.9M
Value Created
$-31.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-49.3M
Organic Growth
$42.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-31.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$799K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$486K$729K$972K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-38.7%-15.9%-4.9%1.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross30.6%11.3%21.5%30.3%
P77
Occupancy15.8%30.8%42.1%55.3%
P4
Rev/Bed$462K$468K$704K$1.1M
P23
Exp/Bed$640K$421K$730K$1.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML