Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH WESLEY 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH WESLEY
CCN 250094 | MS | 121 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$7.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$140.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$7.4M
Modeled Uplift
$5.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.5M (vs $7.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$90K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$78K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$432K$1.3M$1.7M$5.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$90K$90K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$705K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$698K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$572K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$45K$90K$90K$90K$90K$90K$90K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x103% / 34.8x108% / 39.0x112% / 43.2x114% / 45.4x116% / 47.5x
9.0x98% / 30.6x103% / 34.3x107% / 38.1x109% / 40.0x111% / 41.8x
10.0x94% / 27.2x98% / 30.6x102% / 33.9x104% / 35.6x106% / 37.3x
11.0x89% / 24.4x94% / 27.5x98% / 30.6x100% / 32.1x102% / 33.6x
12.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.1x98% / 30.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
74%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 74% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M1.3%
Year 1$1.9M+$4.9M$6.8M4.8%
Year 2$1.9M+$7.4M$9.4M6.6%
Year 3$2.0M+$7.4M$9.4M6.7%
Year 4$2.1M+$7.4M$9.5M6.7%
Year 5$2.1M+$7.4M$9.5M6.8%
$18.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$86.6M
Value Created
$9.5M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$74.1M
RCM Value Creation
$9.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$45K$68K$90K$108K
Total$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-15.2%-4.0%3.1%
P65
Net-to-Gross9.5%9.6%21.1%30.3%
P23
Occupancy82.3%24.6%38.2%53.8%
P96
Rev/Bed$1.2M$464K$643K$1.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.1M$389K$679K$1.1M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML