Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. DOMINIC-JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP 2026-04-26 03:47 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. DOMINIC-JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP
CCN 250048 | MS | 526 beds | Current EBITDA $-186.3M → Pro Forma $-166.9M (+$19.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$367.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-186.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-166.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$19.3M
Modeled Uplift
$12.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.6M (vs $19.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$235K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.1M$202K$7.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.5M$14.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$235K$235K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$118K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.5M$15.7M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-186.3M$-186.3M-50.7%
Year 1$-191.8M+$12.9M$-179.0M-48.7%
Year 2$-197.6M+$19.3M$-178.3M-48.5%
Year 3$-203.5M+$19.3M$-184.2M-50.1%
Year 4$-209.6M+$19.3M$-190.3M-51.8%
Year 5$-215.9M+$19.3M$-196.6M-53.5%
$-1.86B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.16B
Exit EV (11x)
$-300.0M
Value Created
$-196.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-296.7M
Organic Growth
$193.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-196.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$118K$176K$235K$282K
Total$9.7M$14.5M$19.3M$23.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 10 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-15.0%-9.0%-5.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross22.1%19.3%23.6%27.6%
P40
Occupancy61.3%56.9%67.0%72.9%
P30
Rev/Bed$698K$845K$1.1M$1.4M
P10
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.2M$1.6M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML