Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 250040 | MS | 294 beds | Current EBITDA $-53.3M → Pro Forma $-31.5M (+$21.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$415.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-53.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-31.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$21.9M
Modeled Uplift
$15.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.1M (vs $21.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$266K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$229K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$16.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$133K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$11.9M$17.7M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-53.3M$-53.3M-12.8%
Year 1$-54.9M+$14.6M$-40.3M-9.7%
Year 2$-56.6M+$21.9M$-34.7M-8.3%
Year 3$-58.3M+$21.9M$-36.4M-8.8%
Year 4$-60.0M+$21.9M$-38.1M-9.2%
Year 5$-61.8M+$21.9M$-39.9M-9.6%
$-533.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-439.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$93.9M
Value Created
$-39.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-84.9M
Organic Growth
$218.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-39.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$133K$200K$266K$319K
Total$10.9M$16.4M$21.9M$26.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.8%-16.5%-9.0%-0.8%
P30
Net-to-Gross15.7%14.4%21.3%25.8%
P35
Occupancy63.2%31.6%49.7%65.1%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.4M$609K$788K$1.1M
P80
Exp/Bed$1.6M$669K$1.0M$1.2M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML