Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MADISON RIVER OAKS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MADISON RIVER OAKS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 250038 | MS | 67 beds | Current EBITDA $-407K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-407K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$681K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$657K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$651K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$400K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$657K$657K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$633K$18K$651K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$299K$400K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$164K$329K$493K$657K$657K$657K$657K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$163K$325K$488K$651K$651K$651K$651K
A/R Days Reduction$0$133K$267K$400K$400K$400K$400K$400K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$471K$942K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.1x
Headroom (turns)
140%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 140% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.6x, adding 101.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-407K$-407K-1.2%
Year 1$-420K+$1.2M$733K2.2%
Year 2$-432K+$1.7M$1.3M3.9%
Year 3$-445K+$1.7M$1.3M3.9%
Year 4$-458K+$1.7M$1.3M3.9%
Year 5$-472K+$1.7M$1.3M3.8%
$-4.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.9M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-649K
Organic Growth
$17.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$329K$493K$657K$789K
Denial Rate Reductio$325K$488K$651K$781K
A/R Days Reduction$200K$300K$400K$480K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$25K
Total$864K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.2%-22.4%-5.4%3.2%
P64
Net-to-Gross9.7%14.4%27.0%36.4%
P10
Occupancy19.1%26.8%40.3%58.8%
P8
Rev/Bed$490K$320K$552K$923K
P38
Exp/Bed$497K$371K$561K$1.1M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML