Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEM HOSPITAL NORTH MISS 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEM HOSPITAL NORTH MISS
CCN 250034 | MS | 195 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $13.7M (+$12.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$229.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$12.1M
Modeled Uplift
$8.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.6M (vs $12.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$147K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.6M$4.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.4M$126K$4.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$704K$2.1M$2.8M$8.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$147K$147K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$930K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$73K$147K$147K$147K$147K$147K$147K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.8M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x125% / 57.8x130% / 64.6x135% / 71.3x137% / 74.7x139% / 78.1x
9.0x120% / 51.0x125% / 57.0x129% / 63.1x131% / 66.1x133% / 69.1x
10.0x115% / 45.6x120% / 51.0x124% / 56.4x126% / 59.1x128% / 61.9x
11.0x110% / 41.1x115% / 46.1x120% / 51.0x122% / 53.5x124% / 55.9x
12.0x106% / 37.4x111% / 42.0x116% / 46.5x118% / 48.7x120% / 51.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M0.7%
Year 1$1.7M+$8.0M$9.8M4.3%
Year 2$1.8M+$12.1M$13.8M6.0%
Year 3$1.8M+$12.1M$13.9M6.1%
Year 4$1.9M+$12.1M$14.0M6.1%
Year 5$1.9M+$12.1M$14.0M6.1%
$16.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$154.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$137.4M
Value Created
$14.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.7M
Organic Growth
$120.7M
RCM Value Creation
$14.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$73K$110K$147K$176K
Total$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-15.0%-4.9%0.8%
P68
Net-to-Gross23.3%9.7%17.3%28.2%
P64
Occupancy71.8%32.2%42.1%59.4%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.2M$483K$737K$1.1M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.2M$469K$730K$1.1M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML