Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH RIVER REGION 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH RIVER REGION
CCN 250031 | MS | 155 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$106.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$68K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$59K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$328K$972K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$534K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$529K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$433K$866K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.8x103% / 34.5x107% / 38.3x109% / 40.2x111% / 42.1x
9.0x93% / 27.0x98% / 30.4x102% / 33.7x104% / 35.4x106% / 37.1x
10.0x89% / 24.0x93% / 27.0x97% / 30.0x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.0x
11.0x85% / 21.5x89% / 24.2x93% / 27.0x95% / 28.4x97% / 29.7x
12.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x90% / 24.5x91% / 25.7x93% / 27.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
71%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 71% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M1.5%
Year 1$1.7M+$3.7M$5.4M5.1%
Year 2$1.7M+$5.6M$7.3M6.9%
Year 3$1.8M+$5.6M$7.4M6.9%
Year 4$1.8M+$5.6M$7.4M7.0%
Year 5$1.9M+$5.6M$7.5M7.0%
$16.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$82.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$66.2M
Value Created
$7.5M
Exit EBITDA
$2.6M
Organic Growth
$56.2M
RCM Value Creation
$7.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$650K$975K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$68K$82K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-15.7%-4.7%1.5%
P72
Net-to-Gross9.4%10.3%21.8%30.5%
P17
Occupancy55.6%29.1%39.7%54.8%
P77
Rev/Bed$689K$469K$689K$1.1M
P48
Exp/Bed$679K$410K$719K$1.1M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML