Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BILOXI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BILOXI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 250007 | MS | 121 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.8M → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$4.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$78.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$4.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $4.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$953K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$50K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$43K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$240K$713K$953K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$50K$50K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$392K$783K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$388K$775K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$318K$635K$953K$953K$953K$953K$953K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-18.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
25.4x
Headroom (turns)
391%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 391% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -18.9x, adding 117.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.8M$-2.8M-3.6%
Year 1$-2.9M+$2.7M$-184K-0.2%
Year 2$-3.0M+$4.1M$1.1M1.4%
Year 3$-3.1M+$4.1M$1.0M1.3%
Year 4$-3.2M+$4.1M$917K1.2%
Year 5$-3.3M+$4.1M$821K1.0%
$-28.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$9.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.5M
Value Created
$821K
Exit EBITDA
$-4.5M
Organic Growth
$41.2M
RCM Value Creation
$821K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$783K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$775K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$477K$715K$953K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$38K$50K$60K
Total$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.6%-15.2%-4.0%3.1%
P50
Net-to-Gross7.7%9.6%21.1%30.3%
P0
Occupancy31.8%24.6%38.2%53.8%
P37
Rev/Bed$647K$464K$643K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$671K$389K$679K$1.1M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML