Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 23:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 244018 | MN | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $-2.5M (+$654K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 244018

SANFORD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$12.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$654K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$475K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$654K
Modeled Uplift
$431K
Risk-Adjusted
-$223K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$248K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$247K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$151K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$654K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$248K$248K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$238K$8K$247K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$113K$151K$475K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$62K$124K$186K$248K$248K$248K$248K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$123K$185K$247K$247K$247K$247K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$100K$151K$151K$151K$151K$151K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$179K$357K$531K$654K$654K$654K$654K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $654K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-25.6%
Year 1$-3.3M+$436K$-2.8M-22.9%
Year 2$-3.4M+$654K$-2.7M-21.9%
Year 3$-3.5M+$654K$-2.8M-22.7%
Year 4$-3.6M+$654K$-2.9M-23.6%
Year 5$-3.7M+$654K$-3.0M-24.4%
$-31.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-33.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.5M
Value Created
$-3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.1M
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$124K$186K$248K$297K
Denial Rate Reductio$123K$185K$247K$296K
A/R Days Reduction$75K$113K$151K$181K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$327K$491K$654K$785K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.6%-12.9%-3.1%2.8%
P5
Net-to-Gross56.2%52.0%59.3%64.1%
P40
Occupancy45.7%15.7%30.7%41.6%
P79
Rev/Bed$774K$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P14
Exp/Bed$972K$997K$1.7M$2.6M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML