Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — M HEALTH FAIRVIEW BETHESDA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:47 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — M HEALTH FAIRVIEW BETHESDA HOSPITAL
CCN 242004 | MN | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $-483K (+$578K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$578K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-483K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$418K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$578K
Modeled Uplift
$422K
Risk-Adjusted
-$156K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$218K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$218K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$133K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$578K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$210K$8K$218K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$218K$218K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$99K$133K$418K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$55K$109K$164K$218K$218K$218K$218K
Cost to Collect$0$54K$109K$163K$218K$218K$218K$218K
A/R Days Reduction$0$44K$88K$133K$133K$133K$133K$133K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$158K$316K$469K$578K$578K$578K$578K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $578K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-9.7%
Year 1$-1.1M+$386K$-708K-6.5%
Year 2$-1.1M+$578K$-548K-5.0%
Year 3$-1.2M+$578K$-582K-5.3%
Year 4$-1.2M+$578K$-617K-5.7%
Year 5$-1.2M+$578K$-652K-6.0%
$-10.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-7.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.4M
Value Created
$-652K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.7M
Organic Growth
$5.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-652K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$109K$164K$218K$262K
Cost to Collect$109K$163K$218K$262K
A/R Days Reduction$66K$99K$133K$159K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$289K$434K$578K$694K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.7%-11.9%-2.9%3.3%
P26
Net-to-Gross56.7%49.1%56.6%62.8%
P51
Occupancy86.4%16.1%32.9%44.5%
P92
Rev/Bed$454K$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P2
Exp/Bed$498K$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML