Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNITED HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNITED HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 241369 | MN | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $970K → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$970K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$845K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$867K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$858K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$527K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$867K$867K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$834K$24K$858K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$133K$394K$527K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$217K$433K$650K$867K$867K$867K$867K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$215K$429K$644K$858K$858K$858K$858K
A/R Days Reduction$0$176K$352K$527K$527K$527K$527K$527K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$621K$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.1x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x
9.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x
10.0x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.6x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.1x
11.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x
12.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$970K$970K2.2%
Year 1$999K+$1.5M$2.5M5.8%
Year 2$1.0M+$2.3M$3.3M7.6%
Year 3$1.1M+$2.3M$3.3M7.7%
Year 4$1.1M+$2.3M$3.4M7.8%
Year 5$1.1M+$2.3M$3.4M7.9%
$9.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.8M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$22.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$433K$650K$867K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$429K$644K$858K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$264K$396K$527K$633K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-11.9%-2.9%3.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross56.4%49.1%56.6%62.8%
P48
Occupancy27.1%16.1%32.9%44.5%
P38
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P46
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML