Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CCH - SAUK CENTRE 2026-04-26 12:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CCH - SAUK CENTRE
CCN 241368 | MN | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$714K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$823K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$815K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$501K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$823K$823K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$792K$23K$815K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$126K$374K$501K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$206K$411K$617K$823K$823K$823K$823K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$407K$611K$815K$815K$815K$815K
A/R Days Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$501K$501K$501K$501K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$589K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.3x88% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.2x
9.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 22.9x
10.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.3x
11.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
12.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M2.8%
Year 1$1.2M+$1.4M$2.6M6.4%
Year 2$1.2M+$2.2M$3.4M8.3%
Year 3$1.3M+$2.2M$3.4M8.3%
Year 4$1.3M+$2.2M$3.5M8.4%
Year 5$1.3M+$2.2M$3.5M8.5%
$11.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$38.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.0M
Value Created
$3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$21.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$411K$617K$823K$988K
Denial Rate Reductio$407K$611K$815K$978K
A/R Days Reduction$250K$376K$501K$601K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-12.9%-2.9%3.1%
P73
Net-to-Gross61.7%52.5%59.7%64.2%
P65
Occupancy40.9%15.5%30.7%41.6%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.9M$988K$1.7M$2.7M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML