Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WELIA HEALTH 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WELIA HEALTH
CCN 241367 | MN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$106.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$68K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$59K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$328K$971K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$534K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$528K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$433K$866K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x110% / 41.2x115% / 46.1x120% / 51.1x122% / 53.5x124% / 56.0x
9.0x105% / 36.3x110% / 40.6x114% / 45.0x116% / 47.2x118% / 49.4x
10.0x100% / 32.3x105% / 36.3x109% / 40.2x111% / 42.2x113% / 44.2x
11.0x96% / 29.1x101% / 32.7x105% / 36.3x107% / 38.0x109% / 39.9x
12.0x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.7x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.6x105% / 36.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.1x
Headroom (turns)
78%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 78% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.4x, adding 7.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M1.1%
Year 1$1.2M+$3.7M$4.9M4.6%
Year 2$1.2M+$5.6M$6.8M6.4%
Year 3$1.2M+$5.6M$6.9M6.4%
Year 4$1.3M+$5.6M$6.9M6.5%
Year 5$1.3M+$5.6M$6.9M6.5%
$11.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$76.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$64.9M
Value Created
$6.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$56.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$649K$974K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$68K$82K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.1%-9.5%-2.4%3.4%
P62
Net-to-Gross50.2%47.6%56.3%62.3%
P28
Occupancy46.4%16.5%33.7%44.8%
P76
Rev/Bed$4.3M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P92
Exp/Bed$4.2M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML