Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER INC.
CCN 241360 | MN | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $895K → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$895K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$793K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$833K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$824K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$507K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$833K$833K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$802K$23K$824K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$128K$379K$507K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$208K$416K$625K$833K$833K$833K$833K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$206K$412K$618K$824K$824K$824K$824K
A/R Days Reduction$0$169K$338K$507K$507K$507K$507K$507K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$597K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x87% / 23.1x92% / 26.1x96% / 29.0x98% / 30.5x100% / 31.9x
9.0x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.0x
10.0x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.2x86% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x
11.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.3x
12.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$895K$895K2.1%
Year 1$922K+$1.5M$2.4M5.7%
Year 2$949K+$2.2M$3.1M7.5%
Year 3$978K+$2.2M$3.2M7.6%
Year 4$1.0M+$2.2M$3.2M7.7%
Year 5$1.0M+$2.2M$3.2M7.8%
$8.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.6M
Value Created
$3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$21.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$416K$625K$833K$999K
Denial Rate Reductio$412K$618K$824K$989K
A/R Days Reduction$253K$380K$507K$608K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-11.7%-2.6%3.2%
P67
Net-to-Gross54.8%50.0%57.6%63.5%
P39
Occupancy27.4%16.0%32.0%44.3%
P40
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P59
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML