Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GLENCOE REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GLENCOE REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 241355 | MN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.0M → Pro Forma $786K (+$3.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$71.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$786K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $3.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$867K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$46K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$39K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$219K$649K$867K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$46K$46K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$356K$713K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$353K$706K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$289K$578K$867K$867K$867K$867K$867K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-31.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
38.4x
Headroom (turns)
591%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 591% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -31.9x, adding 130.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.0M$-3.0M-4.2%
Year 1$-3.1M+$2.5M$-553K-0.8%
Year 2$-3.1M+$3.7M$605K0.8%
Year 3$-3.2M+$3.7M$511K0.7%
Year 4$-3.3M+$3.7M$414K0.6%
Year 5$-3.4M+$3.7M$313K0.4%
$-29.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.1M
Value Created
$313K
Exit EBITDA
$-4.7M
Organic Growth
$37.5M
RCM Value Creation
$313K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$713K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$706K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$434K$650K$867K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$34K$46K$55K
Total$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.2%-9.5%-2.4%3.4%
P41
Net-to-Gross58.5%47.6%56.3%62.3%
P53
Occupancy31.4%16.5%33.7%44.8%
P46
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P77
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML