Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARRIS HEALTH-REDWOOD LLC 2026-04-26 15:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARRIS HEALTH-REDWOOD LLC
CCN 241351 | MN | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $8.0M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$962K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$678K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$171K$507K$678K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$278K$557K$835K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$276K$551K$827K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$226K$452K$678K$678K$678K$678K$678K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$798K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
9.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M9.0%
Year 1$5.2M+$2.0M$7.1M12.8%
Year 2$5.3M+$2.9M$8.3M14.8%
Year 3$5.5M+$2.9M$8.4M15.1%
Year 4$5.7M+$2.9M$8.6M15.4%
Year 5$5.8M+$2.9M$8.8M15.7%
$50.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$96.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.1M
Value Created
$8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$8.0M
Organic Growth
$29.3M
RCM Value Creation
$8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$557K$835K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$551K$827K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$339K$508K$678K$813K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$43K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.0%-12.9%-2.9%3.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross61.9%52.5%59.7%64.2%
P66
Occupancy33.4%15.5%30.7%41.6%
P56
Rev/Bed$4.0M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.6M$988K$1.7M$2.7M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML