Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TYLER HEALTHCARE CENTER 2026-04-26 15:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TYLER HEALTHCARE CENTER
CCN 241348 | MN | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $93K → Pro Forma $771K (+$678K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$93K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$678K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$771K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$492K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$678K
Modeled Uplift
$390K
Risk-Adjusted
-$288K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$257K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$255K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$678K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$257K$257K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$247K$8K$255K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$117K$156K$492K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$255K$255K$255K$255K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$185K$370K$550K$678K$678K$678K$678K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $678K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x126% / 58.3x131% / 65.2x135% / 72.0x137% / 75.4x140% / 78.8x
9.0x120% / 51.5x125% / 57.6x129% / 63.6x132% / 66.7x134% / 69.7x
10.0x115% / 46.0x120% / 51.5x124% / 57.0x127% / 59.7x129% / 62.4x
11.0x111% / 41.5x116% / 46.5x120% / 51.5x122% / 54.0x124% / 56.5x
12.0x107% / 37.8x112% / 42.4x116% / 46.9x118% / 49.2x120% / 51.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$93K$93K0.7%
Year 1$96K+$452K$548K4.3%
Year 2$99K+$678K$777K6.1%
Year 3$102K+$678K$780K6.1%
Year 4$105K+$678K$783K6.1%
Year 5$108K+$678K$786K6.1%
$934K
Entry EV (10x)
$8.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.7M
Value Created
$786K
Exit EBITDA
$149K
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$786K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$193K$257K$308K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$192K$255K$307K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$187K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$339K$509K$678K$814K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-11.9%-2.4%3.3%
P60
Net-to-Gross64.0%49.8%56.7%63.2%
P76
Occupancy7.5%16.1%32.9%44.5%
P4
Rev/Bed$611K$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P6
Exp/Bed$607K$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML