Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - WASECA 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - WASECA
CCN 241345 | MN | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $2.3M → Pro Forma $3.8M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$429K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$559K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$554K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$340K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$559K$559K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$538K$15K$554K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$255K$340K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$140K$280K$420K$559K$559K$559K$559K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$277K$415K$554K$554K$554K$554K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$227K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$401K$801K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
9.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
10.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
12.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.3M$2.3M8.3%
Year 1$2.4M+$981K$3.4M12.1%
Year 2$2.5M+$1.5M$3.9M14.1%
Year 3$2.5M+$1.5M$4.0M14.3%
Year 4$2.6M+$1.5M$4.1M14.6%
Year 5$2.7M+$1.5M$4.2M14.9%
$23.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.6M
Value Created
$4.2M
Exit EBITDA
$3.7M
Organic Growth
$14.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$280K$420K$559K$671K
Denial Rate Reductio$277K$415K$554K$665K
A/R Days Reduction$170K$255K$340K$408K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.3%-12.6%-3.0%3.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross59.3%52.1%59.5%64.2%
P49
Occupancy63.2%15.6%30.7%41.6%
P90
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.7M$993K$1.7M$2.7M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML