Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SLEEPY EYE MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SLEEPY EYE MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
CCN 241327 | MN | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $894K → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$894K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$785K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$647K
Risk-Adjusted
-$430K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$409K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$405K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$249K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$409K$409K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$394K$11K$405K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$63K$186K$249K$785K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$102K$205K$307K$409K$409K$409K$409K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$101K$203K$304K$405K$405K$405K$405K
A/R Days Reduction$0$83K$166K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$293K$586K$873K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x
9.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
10.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
11.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
12.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$894K$894K4.4%
Year 1$921K+$718K$1.6M8.0%
Year 2$949K+$1.1M$2.0M9.9%
Year 3$977K+$1.1M$2.1M10.0%
Year 4$1.0M+$1.1M$2.1M10.2%
Year 5$1.0M+$1.1M$2.1M10.3%
$8.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.3M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$10.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$205K$307K$409K$491K
Denial Rate Reductio$203K$304K$405K$486K
A/R Days Reduction$125K$187K$249K$299K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$538K$807K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-12.9%-3.1%2.8%
P79
Net-to-Gross67.0%52.0%59.3%64.1%
P81
Occupancy16.6%15.7%30.7%41.6%
P30
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P37
Exp/Bed$1.2M$997K$1.7M$2.6M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML