Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LONG PRAIRIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LONG PRAIRIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 241326 | MN | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $766K (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$766K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$619K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$787K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$779K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$479K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$787K$787K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$758K$22K$779K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$121K$358K$479K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$197K$394K$590K$787K$787K$787K$787K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$195K$390K$584K$779K$779K$779K$779K
A/R Days Reduction$0$160K$319K$479K$479K$479K$479K$479K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.9x
Headroom (turns)
322%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 322% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.4x, adding 113.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-3.3%
Year 1$-1.3M+$1.4M$37K0.1%
Year 2$-1.4M+$2.1M$687K1.7%
Year 3$-1.4M+$2.1M$645K1.6%
Year 4$-1.5M+$2.1M$602K1.5%
Year 5$-1.5M+$2.1M$558K1.4%
$-13.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.2M
Value Created
$558K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.1M
Organic Growth
$20.7M
RCM Value Creation
$558K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$394K$590K$787K$945K
Denial Rate Reductio$390K$584K$779K$935K
A/R Days Reduction$239K$359K$479K$575K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-12.9%-2.9%3.1%
P47
Net-to-Gross60.5%52.5%59.7%64.2%
P54
Occupancy54.5%15.5%30.7%41.6%
P85
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P77
Exp/Bed$2.9M$988K$1.7M$2.7M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML