Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER JACKSON 2026-04-26 16:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER JACKSON
CCN 241315 | MN | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$853K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$853K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$622K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$853K
Modeled Uplift
$516K
Risk-Adjusted
-$337K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$324K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$321K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$197K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$853K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$324K$324K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$312K$9K$321K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$50K$148K$197K$622K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$81K$162K$243K$324K$324K$324K$324K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$80K$161K$241K$321K$321K$321K$321K
A/R Days Reduction$0$66K$132K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$232K$465K$692K$853K$853K$853K$853K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $853K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M19.2%
Year 1$3.2M+$569K$3.8M23.3%
Year 2$3.3M+$853K$4.2M25.6%
Year 3$3.4M+$853K$4.3M26.2%
Year 4$3.5M+$853K$4.4M26.9%
Year 5$3.6M+$853K$4.5M27.5%
$31.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.0M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$8.5M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$162K$243K$324K$389K
Denial Rate Reductio$161K$241K$321K$385K
A/R Days Reduction$99K$148K$197K$237K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$427K$640K$853K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-12.9%-2.9%3.1%
P97
Net-to-Gross52.1%52.5%59.7%64.2%
P24
Occupancy13.6%15.5%30.7%41.6%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P32
Exp/Bed$936K$988K$1.7M$2.7M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML