Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRIDGES MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRIDGES MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 241313 | MN | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$548K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$548K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$396K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$548K
Modeled Uplift
$316K
Risk-Adjusted
-$233K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$207K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$206K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$126K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$548K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$199K$8K$207K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$206K$206K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$94K$126K$396K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$52K$103K$155K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Cost to Collect$0$52K$103K$155K$206K$206K$206K$206K
A/R Days Reduction$0$42K$84K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$150K$300K$445K$548K$548K$548K$548K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $548K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M10.4%
Year 1$1.1M+$366K$1.5M14.3%
Year 2$1.1M+$548K$1.7M16.4%
Year 3$1.2M+$548K$1.7M16.7%
Year 4$1.2M+$548K$1.8M17.1%
Year 5$1.2M+$548K$1.8M17.4%
$10.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.0M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.7M
Organic Growth
$5.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$103K$155K$207K$248K
Cost to Collect$103K$155K$206K$248K
A/R Days Reduction$63K$94K$126K$151K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$274K$411K$548K$658K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.4%-12.9%-2.9%3.1%
P96
Net-to-Gross69.9%52.5%59.7%64.2%
P84
Occupancy6.6%15.5%30.7%41.6%
P4
Rev/Bed$737K$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P13
Exp/Bed$660K$988K$1.7M$2.7M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML