Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SIBLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SIBLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 241311 | MN | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $5.3M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$758K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$624K
Risk-Adjusted
-$415K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$395K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$391K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$240K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$395K$395K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$380K$11K$391K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$180K$240K$758K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$99K$198K$296K$395K$395K$395K$395K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$98K$196K$293K$391K$391K$391K$391K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$160K$240K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$283K$566K$843K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M21.4%
Year 1$4.4M+$693K$5.0M25.5%
Year 2$4.5M+$1.0M$5.5M27.9%
Year 3$4.6M+$1.0M$5.7M28.6%
Year 4$4.8M+$1.0M$5.8M29.3%
Year 5$4.9M+$1.0M$5.9M30.0%
$42.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.1M
Value Created
$5.9M
Exit EBITDA
$6.7M
Organic Growth
$10.4M
RCM Value Creation
$5.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$198K$296K$395K$474K
Denial Rate Reductio$196K$293K$391K$469K
A/R Days Reduction$120K$180K$240K$289K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$520K$780K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.4%-11.7%-2.6%3.2%
P99
Net-to-Gross64.3%50.0%57.6%63.5%
P77
Occupancy14.5%16.0%32.0%44.3%
P20
Rev/Bed$988K$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P18
Exp/Bed$777K$1.1M$1.8M$2.7M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML