Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD HOSPITAL TRACY 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD HOSPITAL TRACY
CCN 241303 | MN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $547K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$678K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$547K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$678K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$492K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$678K
Modeled Uplift
$386K
Risk-Adjusted
-$291K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$257K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$255K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$678K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$257K$257K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$247K$8K$255K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$117K$156K$492K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$192K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$191K$255K$255K$255K$255K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$185K$370K$550K$678K$678K$678K$678K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $678K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x
9.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.5x
10.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
11.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x
12.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$547K$547K4.3%
Year 1$564K+$452K$1.0M7.9%
Year 2$581K+$678K$1.3M9.8%
Year 3$598K+$678K$1.3M9.9%
Year 4$616K+$678K$1.3M10.1%
Year 5$634K+$678K$1.3M10.2%
$5.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.0M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$872K
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$192K$257K$308K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$191K$255K$306K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$187K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$339K$508K$678K$813K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-9.5%-2.4%3.4%
P77
Net-to-Gross60.8%47.6%56.3%62.3%
P65
Occupancy6.4%16.5%33.7%44.8%
P2
Rev/Bed$513K$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P3
Exp/Bed$491K$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML