Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL
CCN 240207 | MN | 172 beds | Current EBITDA $22.3M → Pro Forma $38.9M (+$16.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$316.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$38.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$16.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.3M (vs $16.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$202K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$174K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$970K$2.9M$3.8M$12.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$202K$202K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.1M$13.5M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.3x
9.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.3M$22.3M7.0%
Year 1$22.9M+$11.1M$34.0M10.8%
Year 2$23.6M+$16.6M$40.3M12.7%
Year 3$24.3M+$16.6M$41.0M13.0%
Year 4$25.1M+$16.6M$41.7M13.2%
Year 5$25.8M+$16.6M$42.5M13.4%
$222.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$467.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$244.3M
Value Created
$42.5M
Exit EBITDA
$35.5M
Organic Growth
$166.3M
RCM Value Creation
$42.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$152K$202K$243K
Total$8.3M$12.5M$16.6M$20.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.0%-9.8%-7.0%-0.8%
P82
Net-to-Gross31.6%31.6%38.1%40.2%
P24
Occupancy82.1%58.3%71.7%80.6%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.7M$2.1M$2.6M
P35
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.7M$2.2M$2.9M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML