Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCHS - SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA REGION 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCHS - SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA REGION
CCN 240093 | MN | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $-46.2M → Pro Forma $-21.3M (+$24.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$473.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-46.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-21.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$24.9M
Modeled Uplift
$19.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.5M (vs $24.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$303K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.5M$9.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.1M$260K$9.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.3M$5.8M$18.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$303K$303K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$152K$303K$303K$303K$303K$303K$303K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.2M$24.9M$24.9M$24.9M$24.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-46.2M$-46.2M-9.8%
Year 1$-47.6M+$16.6M$-31.0M-6.5%
Year 2$-49.1M+$24.9M$-24.1M-5.1%
Year 3$-50.5M+$24.9M$-25.6M-5.4%
Year 4$-52.0M+$24.9M$-27.1M-5.7%
Year 5$-53.6M+$24.9M$-28.7M-6.1%
$-462.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-315.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$146.8M
Value Created
$-28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-73.6M
Organic Growth
$249.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$152K$227K$303K$364K
Total$12.5M$18.7M$24.9M$29.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.8%-10.9%-7.0%-0.4%
P32
Net-to-Gross43.4%36.5%40.2%43.5%
P68
Occupancy88.2%43.1%57.7%79.5%
P85
Rev/Bed$4.0M$1.7M$2.2M$3.5M
P79
Exp/Bed$4.4M$1.8M$2.2M$4.0M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML