Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL CTR 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL CTR
CCN 240080 | MN | 634 beds | Current EBITDA $-333.5M → Pro Forma $-236.6M (+$96.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.84B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-333.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$96.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-236.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$70.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$96.9M
Modeled Uplift
$68.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$28.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $68.6M (vs $96.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$36.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$36.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$22.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$96.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$36.8M$36.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$35.5M$1.0M$36.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.7M$16.8M$22.4M$70.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$9.2M$18.4M$27.6M$36.8M$36.8M$36.8M$36.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9.1M$18.2M$27.4M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$7.5M$14.9M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$590K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Cumulative$0$26.4M$52.8M$78.6M$96.9M$96.9M$96.9M$96.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $96.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-333.5M$-333.5M-18.1%
Year 1$-343.5M+$64.6M$-278.9M-15.1%
Year 2$-353.8M+$96.9M$-256.9M-13.9%
Year 3$-364.4M+$96.9M$-267.5M-14.5%
Year 4$-375.4M+$96.9M$-278.5M-15.1%
Year 5$-386.6M+$96.9M$-289.7M-15.7%
$-3.34B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.19B
Exit EV (11x)
$148.4M
Value Created
$-289.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-531.2M
Organic Growth
$969.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-289.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$18.4M$27.6M$36.8M$44.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$18.2M$27.4M$36.5M$43.8M
A/R Days Reduction$11.2M$16.8M$22.4M$26.9M
Clean Claim Rate$590K$884K$1.2M$1.4M
Total$48.5M$72.7M$96.9M$116.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-18.1%-11.2%-7.3%-2.4%
P15
Net-to-Gross30.8%30.8%32.7%38.1%
P23
Occupancy81.0%72.8%77.8%79.0%
P85
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.7M$2.1M$2.4M
P77
Exp/Bed$3.4M$2.0M$2.2M$2.5M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML