Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR
CCN 240050 | MN | 55 beds | Current EBITDA $12.3M → Pro Forma $18.6M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$119.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$367K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$598K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$592K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$485K$970K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.3M$12.3M10.3%
Year 1$12.7M+$4.2M$16.9M14.1%
Year 2$13.1M+$6.3M$19.3M16.2%
Year 3$13.4M+$6.3M$19.7M16.5%
Year 4$13.8M+$6.3M$20.1M16.8%
Year 5$14.3M+$6.3M$20.6M17.2%
$123.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$226.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$103.1M
Value Created
$20.6M
Exit EBITDA
$19.6M
Organic Growth
$62.9M
RCM Value Creation
$20.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$728K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$57K$77K$92K
Total$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.3%-11.8%-5.9%-0.3%
P89
Net-to-Gross35.6%35.5%38.2%43.5%
P25
Occupancy56.9%35.7%48.6%56.9%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.7M$2.4M$3.3M
P39
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.9M$2.3M$3.1M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML