Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WINONA HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WINONA HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 240044 | MN | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $-27.0M → Pro Forma $-21.8M (+$5.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$100.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-27.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-21.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.3M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $5.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$64K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$55K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$308K$912K$1.2M$3.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$64K$64K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$501K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$496K$993K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$407K$813K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$32K$64K$64K$64K$64K$64K$64K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-27.0M$-27.0M-27.0%
Year 1$-27.8M+$3.5M$-24.3M-24.3%
Year 2$-28.7M+$5.3M$-23.4M-23.3%
Year 3$-29.5M+$5.3M$-24.3M-24.2%
Year 4$-30.4M+$5.3M$-25.1M-25.1%
Year 5$-31.3M+$5.3M$-26.1M-26.0%
$-270.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-286.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-16.4M
Value Created
$-26.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-43.1M
Organic Growth
$52.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-26.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$993K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$610K$915K$1.2M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$32K$48K$64K$77K
Total$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.0%-8.7%-3.4%1.6%
P3
Net-to-Gross52.6%41.0%50.2%58.5%
P57
Occupancy38.2%23.3%34.7%46.5%
P59
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.3M$2.2M$3.0M
P59
Exp/Bed$3.1M$1.3M$2.1M$3.2M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML