Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNITED HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNITED HOSPITAL
CCN 240038 | MN | 362 beds | Current EBITDA $-76.2M → Pro Forma $-36.1M (+$40.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$762.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-76.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-36.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$40.1M
Modeled Uplift
$28.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.9M (vs $40.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$488K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.3M$15.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.7M$420K$15.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.3M$29.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$488K$488K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$244K$488K$488K$488K$488K$488K$488K
Cumulative$0$10.9M$21.9M$32.5M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-76.2M$-76.2M-10.0%
Year 1$-78.5M+$26.8M$-51.7M-6.8%
Year 2$-80.8M+$40.1M$-40.7M-5.3%
Year 3$-83.3M+$40.1M$-43.1M-5.7%
Year 4$-85.8M+$40.1M$-45.6M-6.0%
Year 5$-88.3M+$40.1M$-48.2M-6.3%
$-761.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-530.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$231.8M
Value Created
$-48.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-121.4M
Organic Growth
$401.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-48.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.4M$15.3M$18.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$244K$366K$488K$586K
Total$20.1M$30.1M$40.1M$48.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.0%-10.9%-7.6%-3.3%
P29
Net-to-Gross30.6%30.7%32.5%37.7%
P21
Occupancy79.6%72.7%77.4%79.4%
P71
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.8M$2.1M$2.1M
P64
Exp/Bed$2.3M$2.1M$2.2M$2.5M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML