Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - RED WING 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - RED WING
CCN 240018 | MN | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $10.5M (+$7.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$149.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$7.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $7.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$96K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$458K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$96K$96K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$747K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$739K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$606K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x93% / 27.1x98% / 30.4x102% / 33.8x104% / 35.5x106% / 37.2x
9.0x88% / 23.7x93% / 26.7x97% / 29.7x99% / 31.2x101% / 32.7x
10.0x84% / 21.0x88% / 23.7x92% / 26.4x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.1x
11.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.3x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x
12.0x76% / 17.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.4x
Headroom (turns)
67%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 67% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.1x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M1.8%
Year 1$2.7M+$5.2M$7.9M5.3%
Year 2$2.8M+$7.9M$10.6M7.1%
Year 3$2.9M+$7.9M$10.7M7.2%
Year 4$3.0M+$7.9M$10.8M7.2%
Year 5$3.0M+$7.9M$10.9M7.3%
$26.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$119.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$93.7M
Value Created
$10.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$78.6M
RCM Value Creation
$10.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$909K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$72K$96K$115K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-9.2%-2.0%3.3%
P66
Net-to-Gross45.2%47.2%56.2%62.1%
P20
Occupancy42.7%16.6%34.0%45.7%
P71
Rev/Bed$5.5M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P98
Exp/Bed$5.4M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML