Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH HOSPITAL
CCN 240001 | MN | 328 beds | Current EBITDA $-211.3M → Pro Forma $-181.3M (+$30.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$571.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-211.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-181.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$30.1M
Modeled Uplift
$21.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.1M (vs $30.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$366K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.4M$11.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.0M$314K$11.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.2M$7.0M$21.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$366K$366K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.6M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$183K$366K$366K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Cumulative$0$8.2M$16.4M$24.4M$30.1M$30.1M$30.1M$30.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-211.3M$-211.3M-37.0%
Year 1$-217.7M+$20.0M$-197.6M-34.6%
Year 2$-224.2M+$30.1M$-194.2M-34.0%
Year 3$-230.9M+$30.1M$-200.9M-35.2%
Year 4$-237.9M+$30.1M$-207.8M-36.4%
Year 5$-245.0M+$30.1M$-214.9M-37.6%
$-2.11B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$-251.0M
Value Created
$-214.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-336.6M
Organic Growth
$300.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-214.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.7M$8.6M$11.4M$13.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.3M
Clean Claim Rate$183K$274K$366K$439K
Total$15.0M$22.5M$30.1M$36.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-37.0%-10.6%-7.6%-2.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross36.6%30.7%32.4%37.4%
P67
Occupancy72.8%72.7%77.8%80.3%
P27
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.8M$2.1M$2.1M
P20
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.9M$2.2M$2.4M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML