Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRIGHTWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-27 05:14 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRIGHTWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 234044 | MI | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $-587K → Pro Forma $-236K (+$351K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 234044

BRIGHTWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$6.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-587K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$351K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-236K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+542bps
Margin Improvement
$248K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$351K
Modeled Uplift
$248K
Risk-Adjusted
-$103K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$133K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$129K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$79K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$351K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$125K$8K$133K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$129K$129K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$59K$79K$248K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$33K$66K$100K$133K$133K$133K$133K
Cost to Collect$0$32K$65K$97K$129K$129K$129K$129K
A/R Days Reduction$0$26K$52K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$97K$193K$285K$351K$351K$351K$351K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $351K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-587K$-587K-9.1%
Year 1$-605K+$234K$-371K-5.7%
Year 2$-623K+$351K$-272K-4.2%
Year 3$-641K+$351K$-291K-4.5%
Year 4$-661K+$351K$-310K-4.8%
Year 5$-681K+$351K$-330K-5.1%
$-5.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.2M
Value Created
$-330K
Exit EBITDA
$-935K
Organic Growth
$3.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-330K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$66K$100K$133K$159K
Cost to Collect$65K$97K$129K$155K
A/R Days Reduction$39K$59K$79K$94K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$175K$263K$351K$421K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.1%-10.4%0.6%9.2%
P29
Net-to-Gross51.9%33.5%41.9%52.0%
P73
Occupancy72.5%15.6%29.6%54.3%
P87
Rev/Bed$281K$652K$1.4M$2.4M
P5
Exp/Bed$307K$688K$1.5M$2.3M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML