Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL CENTER OF MICHIGAN 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL CENTER OF MICHIGAN
CCN 234042 | MI | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $908K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$665K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$908K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$665K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$482K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$665K
Modeled Uplift
$491K
Risk-Adjusted
-$174K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$252K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$250K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$153K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$665K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$252K$252K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$242K$8K$250K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$114K$153K$482K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$126K$189K$252K$252K$252K$252K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$63K$125K$188K$250K$250K$250K$250K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$102K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$181K$363K$539K$665K$665K$665K$665K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $665K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.1x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$908K$908K7.2%
Year 1$936K+$443K$1.4M11.0%
Year 2$964K+$665K$1.6M12.9%
Year 3$993K+$665K$1.7M13.2%
Year 4$1.0M+$665K$1.7M13.4%
Year 5$1.1M+$665K$1.7M13.7%
$9.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.8M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$126K$189K$252K$302K
Denial Rate Reductio$125K$188K$250K$300K
A/R Days Reduction$77K$115K$153K$184K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$332K$498K$665K$797K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-12.4%-3.3%8.3%
P70
Net-to-Gross56.8%31.4%37.3%46.5%
P84
Occupancy92.1%17.4%36.4%55.1%
P97
Rev/Bed$299K$646K$1.4M$2.3M
P5
Exp/Bed$278K$617K$1.5M$2.3M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML