Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STONECREST 2026-04-26 17:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STONECREST
CCN 234038 | MI | 182 beds | Current EBITDA $13.8M → Pro Forma $16.9M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$792K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$730K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$38K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$184K$546K$730K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$38K$38K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$300K$600K$900K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$297K$594K$891K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$243K$487K$730K$730K$730K$730K$730K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cumulative$0$860K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.8M$13.8M22.9%
Year 1$14.2M+$2.1M$16.3M27.1%
Year 2$14.6M+$3.2M$17.7M29.6%
Year 3$15.0M+$3.2M$18.2M30.3%
Year 4$15.5M+$3.2M$18.6M31.1%
Year 5$15.9M+$3.2M$19.1M31.8%
$137.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$210.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$72.6M
Value Created
$19.1M
Exit EBITDA
$21.9M
Organic Growth
$31.6M
RCM Value Creation
$19.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$600K$900K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$594K$891K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$365K$548K$730K$876K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$38K$46K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.9%-13.3%-6.9%-0.2%
P96
Net-to-Gross39.8%24.9%30.7%37.0%
P80
Occupancy90.8%56.6%68.2%81.0%
P95
Rev/Bed$330K$955K$1.4M$1.9M
P13
Exp/Bed$254K$936K$1.4M$2.1M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML