Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARO CENTER 2026-04-26 15:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARO CENTER
CCN 234025 | MI | 182 beds | Current EBITDA $648K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$434K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$648K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$434K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$311K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$434K
Modeled Uplift
$273K
Risk-Adjusted
-$161K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$164K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$162K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$99K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$434K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$156K$8K$164K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$162K$162K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$74K$99K$311K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$41K$82K$123K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Cost to Collect$0$40K$81K$121K$162K$162K$162K$162K
A/R Days Reduction$0$33K$66K$99K$99K$99K$99K$99K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$119K$238K$353K$434K$434K$434K$434K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $434K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$648K$648K8.0%
Year 1$667K+$289K$957K11.8%
Year 2$687K+$434K$1.1M13.8%
Year 3$708K+$434K$1.1M14.1%
Year 4$729K+$434K$1.2M14.4%
Year 5$751K+$434K$1.2M14.6%
$6.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.6M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.0M
Organic Growth
$4.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$82K$123K$164K$197K
Cost to Collect$81K$121K$162K$194K
A/R Days Reduction$49K$74K$99K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$217K$326K$434K$521K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-13.3%-6.9%-0.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%24.9%30.7%37.0%
P93
Occupancy54.2%56.6%68.2%81.0%
P20
Rev/Bed$44K$955K$1.4M$1.9M
P2
Exp/Bed$323K$936K$1.4M$2.1M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML