Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARBOR OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARBOR OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 234021 | MI | 164 beds | Current EBITDA $9.9M → Pro Forma $12.6M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$51.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$714K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$627K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$991K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$158K$469K$627K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$257K$515K$772K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$255K$510K$765K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$209K$418K$627K$627K$627K$627K$627K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$738K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.9M$9.9M19.2%
Year 1$10.2M+$1.8M$12.0M23.3%
Year 2$10.5M+$2.7M$13.2M25.7%
Year 3$10.8M+$2.7M$13.5M26.3%
Year 4$11.1M+$2.7M$13.9M26.9%
Year 5$11.5M+$2.7M$14.2M27.6%
$99.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$156.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.1M
Value Created
$14.2M
Exit EBITDA
$15.8M
Organic Growth
$27.1M
RCM Value Creation
$14.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$515K$772K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$510K$765K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$313K$470K$627K$752K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-13.4%-6.7%-0.2%
P92
Net-to-Gross37.4%23.7%30.8%37.7%
P72
Occupancy87.0%54.5%67.7%81.4%
P85
Rev/Bed$314K$928K$1.4M$1.9M
P11
Exp/Bed$254K$833K$1.4M$2.0M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML