Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE SPECIALTY HOSP 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE SPECIALTY HOSP
CCN 232036 | MI | 19 beds | Current EBITDA $43K → Pro Forma $206K (+$163K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 232036

HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE SPECIALTY HOSP
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$2.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$43K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$163K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$206K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+578bps
Margin Improvement
$108K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$163K
Modeled Uplift
$108K
Risk-Adjusted
-$54K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$62K
+222bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$56K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$34K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+34bp
Total EBITDA Impact$163K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$54K$8K$62K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$56K$56K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$9K$26K$34K$108K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$16K$31K$47K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cost to Collect$0$14K$28K$42K$56K$56K$56K$56K
A/R Days Reduction$0$11K$23K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$46K$92K$133K$163K$163K$163K$163K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $163K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x101% / 32.6x105% / 36.6x110% / 40.6x112% / 42.5x114% / 44.5x
9.0x96% / 28.6x100% / 32.1x104% / 35.7x106% / 37.5x108% / 39.2x
10.0x91% / 25.4x96% / 28.6x100% / 31.8x102% / 33.4x104% / 35.0x
11.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.6x98% / 30.1x99% / 31.5x
12.0x83% / 20.6x88% / 23.3x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.3x96% / 28.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.7x
Headroom (turns)
73%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 73% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.8x, adding 6.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$43K$43K1.5%
Year 1$45K+$108K$153K5.4%
Year 2$46K+$163K$209K7.4%
Year 3$47K+$163K$210K7.5%
Year 4$49K+$163K$211K7.5%
Year 5$50K+$163K$213K7.6%
$434K
Entry EV (10x)
$2.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$213K
Exit EBITDA
$69K
Organic Growth
$1.6M
RCM Value Creation
$213K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$31K$47K$62K$75K
Cost to Collect$28K$42K$56K$68K
A/R Days Reduction$17K$26K$34K$41K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$81K$122K$163K$195K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-11.1%-1.3%9.2%
P58
Net-to-Gross46.8%34.3%42.9%54.1%
P58
Occupancy54.8%12.4%28.0%47.3%
P79
Rev/Bed$148K$657K$1.4M$2.3M
P2
Exp/Bed$146K$712K$1.5M$2.3M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML