Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - KALAMAZOO 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - KALAMAZOO
CCN 232035 | MI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $688K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$696K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$688K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$696K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$506K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$696K
Modeled Uplift
$498K
Risk-Adjusted
-$198K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$264K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$262K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$161K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$696K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$264K$264K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$254K$8K$262K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$120K$161K$506K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$66K$132K$198K$264K$264K$264K$264K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$66K$131K$197K$262K$262K$262K$262K
A/R Days Reduction$0$54K$107K$161K$161K$161K$161K$161K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$190K$380K$565K$696K$696K$696K$696K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $696K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.4x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
9.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
10.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
11.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$688K$688K5.2%
Year 1$709K+$464K$1.2M8.9%
Year 2$730K+$696K$1.4M10.8%
Year 3$752K+$696K$1.4M11.0%
Year 4$775K+$696K$1.5M11.1%
Year 5$798K+$696K$1.5M11.3%
$6.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.6M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$7.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$132K$198K$264K$317K
Denial Rate Reductio$131K$197K$262K$315K
A/R Days Reduction$80K$120K$161K$193K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$348K$522K$696K$835K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.2%-11.6%-3.4%8.0%
P67
Net-to-Gross12.6%33.2%40.1%48.5%
P0
Occupancy70.8%12.9%28.2%53.0%
P88
Rev/Bed$528K$657K$1.4M$2.4M
P17
Exp/Bed$500K$712K$1.5M$2.4M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML