Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - MACOMB COUNTY INC. 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - MACOMB COUNTY INC.
CCN 232023 | MI | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $8.1M → Pro Forma $11.2M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$59.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$915K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$726K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$38K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$183K$543K$726K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$38K$38K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$298K$597K$895K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$295K$591K$886K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$242K$484K$726K$726K$726K$726K$726K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cumulative$0$855K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.1M$8.1M13.5%
Year 1$8.3M+$2.1M$10.4M17.4%
Year 2$8.6M+$3.1M$11.7M19.6%
Year 3$8.8M+$3.1M$12.0M20.1%
Year 4$9.1M+$3.1M$12.2M20.5%
Year 5$9.4M+$3.1M$12.5M21.0%
$80.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$56.8M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$12.9M
Organic Growth
$31.4M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$597K$895K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$591K$886K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$363K$545K$726K$871K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$38K$46K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.1M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.5%-13.7%-5.9%2.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross17.8%23.1%30.2%38.0%
P10
Occupancy71.1%49.5%64.7%76.6%
P65
Rev/Bed$523K$520K$1.3M$1.9M
P25
Exp/Bed$453K$510K$1.3M$2.0M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML